Legal Opinion

Crist v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1925No. 24,185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff George Dubois owned a Ford car. His brother-in-law, Lester Crist, operated the car while Dubois was riding with him. Each brought a separate action against defendant involving the same accident as well as the same questions of fact and law. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. It was stipulated upon the trial that the defense of contributory negligence, if established by the evidence, applied equally to the case of each plaintiff, and if the jury should find, or the court should hold, that Crist was guilty of contributory negligence, such negli gence would be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. E. Weiner Co. v. FreygangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. In re KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Whitcher v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Wheeler Tp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Holmes v. T. M. Strider & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Alabama & v. Ry. Co. v. GrahamMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Murphy v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Nickelsen v. Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API