Legal Opinion

Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1991No. 90-15484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

This is an action brought by a large timber company challenging the Forest Service’s interpretation of regulations used to determine the percentage of timber sales set aside for small timber businesses within the Apache market area of the Apache-Sit-greaves National Forest in Arizona. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Forest Service. We agree with the district court that the Forest Service’s interpretation and application of its regulations are not arbitrary, capricious, or inconsistent with law. We affirm.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Since 1971…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Joseph Clem v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, HhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. S & M Investment Co., a California General Partnership v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Public Entity, Does I Through Xxx, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Simpson v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Overton Power District No. 5 v. WatkinsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993
  2. Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. F. Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API