Frazier v. State

From a conviction in the county court of Pawnee county for ,a violation of the prohibitory law, plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.

The defendant contends there was error in the fol lowing particulars: First, insufficiency of the information; second, the admission on behalf of the state of incompetent evidence, third, error in the court’s instructions.

The information charges that the defendant maintained “a place where intoxicating liquors, to wit, whisky, * * * were received and kept for the purpose of bartering, selling, and giving away.” The defendant contends…