Legal Opinion
Ward v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 2, 1918No. A-2671PublishedCited by 30 opinions
Appeal from County Court, Tulsa County; J. W. Woodford, Judge. Dan Ward was convicted of the offense of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment, in the county jail for 90 days, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.
The first assignment of error relied upon for reversal of this judgment is:
“That the court erred in overruling the demurrer of the defendant to the information.”
The information under which this prosecution ‘was had is as follows:
“State of Oklahoma, County of Tulsa. In the County' Court within and for Said County and State. The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. Dan Ward, Defendant. Information for Unlawful Possession of Intoxicating Liquors. Be it Remembered: That Ed Crossland, the duly qualified and acting county attorney for Tulsa county, Oklahoma, who prosecutes in the name and by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Dave v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Price Peck v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Yakum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- State v. PerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.