Legal Opinion
Hamer v. City of Trinidad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2019No. 17-1456PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARSON, Circuit Judge.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") mandates that "no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity." 42 U.S.C. § 12132 . Similarly, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("RA") mandates in part that "[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Exby-Stolley v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Center for Independence of the Disabled v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Kientz v. Commissioner, SSACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Wyo-Ben Inc. v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.