Legal Opinion

Portuondo v. Agard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 2000No. 98-1170PublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

In this case we consider whether it was constitutional for a prosecutor, in her summation, to call the jury’s attention to the fact that the defendant had the opportunity to hear all other witnesses testify and to tailor his testimony accordingly.

I

Respondent’s trial on 19 sodomy and assault counts and 3 weapons counts ultimately came down to a credibility determination. The alleged victim, Nessa Winder, and her friend, Breda Keegan, testified that respondent physically assaulted, raped, and orally and anally sodomized Winder, and that he threatened both women with a handgun. Respondent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by296 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API