Legal Opinion

Correll v. Werner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1981No. 1699, 1700 and 1701PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in directing verdicts for appellees in these vehicular negligence actions because the issue of contributory negligence should have been submitted to the jury. 1 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgments of the court below and remand for a new trial.

“In our Commonwealth, it has long been held that only in a case where the facts are all clear, and there is no room for doubt, should the case be removed from the jury’s consideration, and a motion for a directed verdict or binding instructions be granted.” Stephens v. Carrara, 265…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Takach v. B. M. Root Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Thomas v. Allegheny & Eastern Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Crawford v. HalkovicsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API