Correll v. Werner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erred in directing verdicts for appellees in these vehicular negligence actions because the issue of contributory negligence should have been submitted to the jury. 1 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgments of the court below and remand for a new trial.
“In our Commonwealth, it has long been held that only in a case where the facts are all clear, and there is no room for doubt, should the case be removed from the jury’s consideration, and a motion for a directed verdict or binding instructions be granted.” Stephens v. Carrara, 265…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Takach v. B. M. Root Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Thomas v. Allegheny & Eastern Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Crawford v. HalkovicsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.