Legal Opinion
Lesch v. Lesch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: We find no error in Supreme Court’s crediting the testimony of defendant’s expert witness regarding the enhanced earning capacity of plaintiff, resulting from a dental degree earned during the marriage, to determine defendant’s equitable share of the dental practice (see, Rosenstock v Rosenstock, 139 AD2d 164; see generally, Finocchio v Finocchio, 162 AD2d 1044; DiCaprio v DiCaprio, 162 AD2d 944, lv denied 77…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Petrie v. PetrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Finocchio v. FinocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- DiCaprio v. DiCaprioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Costanza v. CostanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southwick v. SouthwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pilato v. PilatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013