Legal Opinion
Pilato v. Pilato
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly classified 27 shares of defendant’s closely-held corporation transferred to defendant during the marriage as marital property (see, Sclafani v Sclafani, 178 AD2d 830; Hackett v Hackett, 147 AD2d 611, 614; Wegman v Wegman, 123 AD2d 220, 230). Defendant did not meet his burden of establishing that the shares were separate property (see, McSparron v McSparron, 190 AD2d 74, 77; Heine v…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Heine v. HeineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cassano v. CassanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hackett v. HackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gulisano v. GulisanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Summer v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996