Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Edmonds

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2005No. 26836PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Don and Vera Littlefield, purchased seventy-seven acres at a foreclosure sale on September 16, 1993. 1 The seventy-seven acres were subject to a recorded deed of trust; Woodrow and Charlotte Edmonds, the parents of Defendant James Matthew Edmonds, were the grantors of the deed of trust. Plaintiffs brought claims in a court-tried case to ascertain the parties’ rights and responsibilities, and subsequently brought this appeal from an adverse judgment. We affirm the judgment.

In November of 1981, Woodrow and Charlotte Edmonds executed a promissory note…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. PaineWebber, Inc. v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. VanBooven v. SmullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Hughes v. NeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Cozart v. Mazda Distributors (Gulf), Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Kellogg v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Central Parking System of Missouri, LLC v. Tucker Parking Holdings, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Andrews v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Derek Loudermilk, et al. v. Rushmore & Mr. Cooper, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
  4. Ford v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  5. Henreid v. Kodner Watkins LCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API