Legal Opinion
United States v. Harry Jamar Gordon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1999No. 98-4054PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Harry Jamar Gordon appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. 1 After denying Defendant’s § 2255 motion, the district court did not grant his application for a certificate of appealability (“COA”). Athough Defendant did not renew his request for a COA in this court, we construe his notice of appeal as such a request. See Fed. R.App. P. 22(b)(2). Therefore, we must address whether a COA should issue for which, if any, of Defendant’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (“unless a circuit justice…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. George Don GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ernest Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Angel Cepero A/K/A Angel Villar-Cepero A/K/A Mosquito Angel CeperoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Frost v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Dulworth v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.