Legal Opinion

Moulder v. Kempff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1888No. 14,133PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

This was an application by Martz Kempff to the board of commissioners of the county of Howard for a license to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time in the town of Eussiaville in that county. Section 5314, E. S. 1881.

Thomas M. Moulder remonstrated against the granting of a license to Kempff’, upon the grounds that he had formerly been connected with the sale of intoxicating liquors at the place described in his application, and that during that time he and his partner in the business had kept a disorderly house; also, that on a day named he, the said Kempff, had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Krutz v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Eslinger v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hays v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Louisville & Southern Traction Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. City of Huntington v. FolkIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Board of Commissioners v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Advance Veneer & Lumber Co. v. HornadayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API