Legal Opinion

Januska v. Mullins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1951No. Docket 33, Calendar 44,893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, C. J.

Defendants George H. Yigeant and Elizabeth E. Yigeant, his wife, appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs for $3,059.09 and costs. The case was dismissed as to defendant the Mulvee Corporation. Defendant J. Thomas Mullins suffered judgment by default and has taken no appeal. We herein refer to the defendants George H. Yigeant and Elizabeth E. Yigeant as though they were the only defendants.

Plaintiff sued as third-party beneficiaries on a contract made by and between the defendants and J. Thomas Mullins.

On January 28, 1947, J. Thomas Mullins contracted to build a house for plaintiffs Daniel and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flickema v. Henry Kraker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rich v. Daily Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Milligan v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tradesman Co. v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Allen v. WhitlarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tcp Industries, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc., Donald C. FresneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Wenfang Liu v. Timothy MundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Edgecomb v. Traverse City School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Dusendang v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Schrier v. FrenchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API