Legal Opinion

Allen v. Whitlark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The only question in this case is whether the burden of proof is upon plaintiff or defendant to show what, if any, effort was made by a wrongfully discharged servant to obtain employment during the remainder of the period for which he was hired, in a case where the servant brings an action for breach of the contract. The case is ruled by Farrell v. School-District, 98 Mich. 43, which holds that it is upon the defendant.

The judgment of the circuit court will be reversed, and that of the justice affirmed, with costs of all courts.

McGrath, C. J., Grant and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. Preferred Bankers' Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Januska v. MullinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Miller v. Yellowstone Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Robinson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API