Legal Opinion
Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2003No. 00-56159PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge.
The opinion filed November 19, 2002, is hereby amended to include the following:
Bank of America (“BofA”) seeks an award of attorney’s fees incurred in connection with this appeal. 1 Thrifty disputes BofA’s eligibility for attorney’s fees, arguing that BofA waived its right to fees in a settlement agreement entered into during proceedings in the bankruptcy court. Thrifty also argues that even if BofA did not waive its right to attorney’s fees, fees should not be awarded because the primary issues on appeal were based on federal,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- In Re CanevaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Motoyama v. Hawaii, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- In Re Tribune Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Sanders v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Long Term Capital Holdings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.