Legal Opinion
Motoyama v. Hawaii, Department of Transportation
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 29, 2012No. Civ. No. 10-00464 ACK-RLPPublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 11, 2010, Plaintiff Elizabeth-Ann K. Motoyama (“Plaintiff’), appearing pro se,1 filed a complaint against the Hawaii Department of Transportation (“HDOT”), alleging employment discrimination. On August 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against the HDOT and Glen Okimoto, in his official capacity as current Director of the HDOT (together, “Defendants”). Doc. No. 56. The Second Amended Complaint asserts claims of unlawful retaliation under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Armijo v. Costco Wholesale Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Armijo v. Costco Wholesale Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Aubart v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Aubart v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Banks v. University of Alaska AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.