State v. Compassionate Home Care, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction of criminal neglect of a vulnerable adult in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.233, subd. 1 (1996). Because the district court abused its discretion in instructing the jury and erred in responding to a jury question without notifying counsel, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Compassionate Home Care (CHC) is a corporation that is licensed to provide home-care services. In 1997, at the time of the events charged in the criminal complaint, CHC was owned by Charlie and Roberta Parker, and Trina Asche, the assistant administrator, was in charge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Cannon Falls TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006