Legal Opinion

State v. Gleason

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 19, 1996No. 94C-20164; CA A86307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for racketeering, ORS 166.720, first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, and first-degree aggravated theft, ORS 164.057. We affirm.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Gefre, 137 Or App 77, 79, 903 P2d 386 (1995). Defendant is a self-employed horse trainer. He also buys and sells horses. On a number of occasions he purchased or sold horses at Woodburn Auction Yard.

During the five-week period between November 16, 1993, and December 24, 1993, defendant sold at least seven horses. In each of the seven instances, the horses had been stolen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. United States v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. Ortega-GonsalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API