Legal Opinion

Rondy v. Rondy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1983No. 10998PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, P.J.

Sandra Tucker, plaintiff-appellant, appeals from an order overruling her motion to find the defendant-appellee, her ex-husband Thomas Rondy, in contempt for failure to pay child support. The trial court found that due to its two previous orders modifying Rondy’s obligation of support, the defendant was not in arrears and had no current duty of child support. We reverse.

Facts

Although the facts are not in dispute, this case has a rather complex factual and procedural history which, we believe, necessitates a somewhat lengthy recitation of the circumstances giving rise to this appeal.

Thomas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,779 in Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Tari v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Romito v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Grant v. IvyOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Antonopoulos v. EisnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bjugan v. BjuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Plant Equipment, Inc. v. Nationwide Control Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Newark Orthopedics, Inc. v. BrockOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. PearlmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Hall v. SilverOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API