Legal Opinion

Antonopoulos v. Eisner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1972No. 31038PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilbeRT, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas, overruling defendant appellant’s motion to vacate a $10,000 default judgment, taken upon her failure to answer or otherwise appear and defend. Plaintiff’s claim is in tort, for negligence, to recover for injuries sustained in a parking lot collision between automobiles driven by the parties. The whole of her special damages came to approximately $500.

By the motion to vacate, as supported by briefs, affidavits, and testimony, the defendant contends that her failure to answer was due to excusable neglect, and that she has a good…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Tolson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  4. Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mount Olive Baptist Church v. Pipkins Paints & Home Improvement Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API