Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Katz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff alleged that her grandmother loaned to the defendant personally the sum of $500, and as evidence of said loan the defendant gave her a note payable to the plaintiff in the sum of $500; that the defendant caused the note to be signed “The Katz & Mullen Co., Trustee by Jacob H. Katz Presi dent” but there never was any legal entity in manner and form as that signature would indicate, but, instead, the entity described in the signature was the defendant; and that there was a balance due on the note, together with all interest on the sum of $500. The court has found' that on August…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BullockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  2. State v. PalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Contino v. TurelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Spiro v. NitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. Judd v. H. S. Coe & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Simons v. SciroccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API