Legal Opinion
Lewis Invisible Stitch Mach. Co. v. Popper
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1940No. 6869PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion brought on by Order to Show Cause why the defendant Max Popper should not be held for civil contempt for violation of the injunction issued in this cause dated April 3, 1934, restraining the defendant from infringing the Gruman Patents Nos. 1,891,308 and 1,909,346 and to further show cause, if any there be, why an attachment should not issue against the defendant.
After trial and hearing upon the merits of the issue raised by the Bill of Complaint, charging infringement of Gruman Patents Nos. 1,891,308 and 1,909,346 and upon the Answer an opinion dated…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Pastry Products Corp. v. United Products Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward DrathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Superior Testers, Inc. v. Damco Testers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- McFadden v. Nickel Processing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958