Shipman v. Bennett
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
After examination of the various claims made by respondents, in this action to set aside a judgment on the ground of fraud, we conclude that the complaint — when construed liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties — states a cause of action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 275; Morgenstern v. Cohon, 2 N Y 2d 302; Dulberg v. Mock, 1 N Y 2d 54, 56; Curren v. O'Connor, 304 N. Y. 515; Condon v. Associated Hosp. Service, 287 N. Y. 411, 414).
The judgment appealed from dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint should be reversed, and the order of Special Term denying defendants’ motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Curren v. O'ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Bramley v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- James v. . ChalmersNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.