People v. Bartell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court erred in restricting defense counsel’s cross-examination of a police officer with regard to a sexual harassment complaint filed against that officer by defendant’s wife. Defendant was entitled to show the officer’s hostility or bias toward him and the restriction of his cross-examination of the officer deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see, People v Vigliotti, 203 AD2d 898, 898-899; People v Green, 156 AD2d 465, lv denied 75 NY2d 813). The evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming, however, and we conclude that there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. AshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. SampelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. RicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- REID, DANHAILE R., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014