Legal Opinion

People v. Bartell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court erred in restricting defense counsel’s cross-examination of a police officer with regard to a sexual harassment complaint filed against that officer by defendant’s wife. Defendant was entitled to show the officer’s hostility or bias toward him and the restriction of his cross-examination of the officer deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see, People v Vigliotti, 203 AD2d 898, 898-899; People v Green, 156 AD2d 465, lv denied 75 NY2d 813). The evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming, however, and we conclude that there…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. AshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. SampelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. RicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. REID, DANHAILE R., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API