People v. Ricks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying his objection, pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), to the prosecutor’s peremptory challenges of two black prospective jurors. The prosecutor offered race-neutral explanations for those challenges, and “the trial court was in the best position to observe the prosecutor’s demeanor and determine whether his explanations were credible or merely pretexts for racial discrimination” (People v Adams, 247 AD2d 625, lv denied 92 NY2d 847; see, People v Virgil, 266 AD2d 847).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BartellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. VirgilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. CarelockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005