Legal Opinion

Steele v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 19, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

In an indictment containing two counts plaintiff in error was charged with forgery and uttering a forged instrument. The trial upon this indictment resulted in a verdict of guilty as charged. Motion for new trial was made and granted as to the first count charging forgery, but denied as to the second count charging the uttering of a forged receipt. To review the judgment imposing sentence writ of error was taken.

The ruling of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to require the State to elect between the two counts of the indictment before proceeding with the trial is assigned as error,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Danford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Settles v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. McSwain v. HowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  5. Florida Land Investment Co. v. WliliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Hoover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. H. & C. Operating Co. v. FossumSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API