Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 12, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of error brings for review a judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of three certain cows.

The only contention made by the plaintiffs in error is' that reversible error occurred by .reason of the giving of a charge as follows, which was given by the court of its own motion, to-wit:

“The law is that where one is found in the possession of recently stolen property, and does not make a creditable explanation as to how he came into possession of such property, it is prima facie evidence of his guilt of the larceny of that property.
“ ‘Possession’ does not always necessarily mean…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McSwain v. HowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Bynum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Stearns & Culver Lumber Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Solomon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Simpkin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API