Legal Opinion

State v. Bey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 11, 1999PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

Defendant, Marko Bey, appeals as of right under Rule 2:2-1(a)(3) from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his death sentence. He contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his second penalty-phase trial for the murder of Carol Peniston. Specifically, he maintains that his attorney insufficiently investigated and presented evidence to support the mitigating factors. Bey also argues that the ineffective assistance of counsel led to the denial of his right to testify and his right of allocution.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. State v. GarronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. State v. ArthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. State v. Nunez-ValdezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API