Springer v. Spruiell
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The court of appeals consolidated these two appeals and dismissed them for want of jurisdiction as appeals of interlocutory orders. In its originally unpublished opinion the court of appeals concluded that summary judgments reciting that plaintiffs “have and recover nothing” do not dispose of all claims asserted by plaintiffs because summary judgment procedure does not presume all issues and claims are reached. 866 S.W.2d 626. Since that court’s disposition, however, we have issued our opinion in Mafrige v. Ross, 866 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.1993), which holds that such express language purporting to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Springer v. First National Bank of Plainview, TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Inglish v. Union State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001