Lawrence Tennille v. Francisco Quintana
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Lawrence Kemp Tennille, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the record, we conclude that the appeal does not present a substantial question. Therefore, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.
In September 2009, Tennille filed a complaint, which he later amended, alleging that prison officials at FCI-McKean denied his…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Marsh v. LinkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- BELL v. SORBERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Conaway v. McAfee-GarnerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- JACKSON v. IRWINDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- QUICK v. MENDOFIKDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.