Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1971No. M-1029Published

1Opinion of the Court

E ,~~-~ToRNEY GENERAL OF%-EXAS December 29, 1971 Hon. Jack Burton, O.D. Opinion No. M- 1029 Chairman Texas Optometry Board Re: Construction of Article 603 West 13,th Street 4552-5.09, Vernon's Civil Austin, Texas 78701 Statutes (the Texas Optometry Act), relating to price adver- Dear Dr. Burton: tising by optometrists. Your recent letter requesting the opinion of this office concerning the referenced matter states as follows: "The Texas Dptometry Board respectfully submits the attached Board Interpretation of Section 5.09 of the Texas Optometry Act for an Attorney General's Opinion as to its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API