Masetta v. National Bronze & Aluminum Foundry Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.
The plaintiff asserts that he brings this action not for himself alone but for himself and others (unidentified) having a common interest in *311the subject matter of the cause of action. We must, therefore, consider the petition as an effort to institute and maintain a class action.
By way of equitable relief plaintiff seeks to enforce an employment contract by injunctive order directing the defendant to discharge its maintenance and production employees and to re-employ plaintiff and “other said employees.” This amounts to an effort to procure specific performance.
The rendering of unique…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Poet Clinton Railroad v. Cleveland & Toledo RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1862
- Davies v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Beatty v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Chambers v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.