Legal Opinion

Poet Clinton Railroad v. Cleveland & Toledo Railroad

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1862PublishedCited by 28 opinions

RESERVED in the district court of Ottawa county. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGholsoN, J.

The Cleveland and Toledo Railroad Company is the product of a consolidation of the Toledo, Norwalk and' Cleveland Railroad Company, and the Junction Railroad Company. This consolidation was effected on the 15th of July, 1853, by an agreement that day made, to take effect on the 1st of September, 1853. By the terms of the consolidation, the Toledo, Norwalk and Cleveland Company was to issue to its stockholders an amount of stock or bonds equal *546to one half of tbe then amount of its capital stock, and with this addition, the aggregate stock of the two companies was to become the stock of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  2. Stuyvesant v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  3. Case of ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1821
  4. De Rivafinoli v. CorsettiNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  5. Lessee of Good v. ZercherOhio Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API