Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1962PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

In this arbitration proceeding the appellant appeals from an order confirming an arbitrators’ award and denying appellant’s application to vacate the said award.

The vacatur was sought on four grounds. One of the grounds, charging that one of the arbitrators made independent visits to the building whose construction was the subject matter of the arbitration, is frivolous. The arbitrator explains those visits by saying that they were simply normal shopping visits made by him and his wife from their home in the neighboring vicinity. There is no reason to believe otherwise since prior to such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Friedman & FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. In re the Arbitration of E. Richard Meinig Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. In Re the Arbitration of the E. Richard Meinig Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Gonzales v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Bernstein v. Gramercy Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. St. Paul Insurance Companies v. LusisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API