Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Kansas City So

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1999No. 98-60590Published

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 98-60590 _______________ WILLARD RUSHING and PATRICIA RUSHING, Plaintiffs-Appellants, VERSUS KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi _________________________ August 30, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, SMITH and excessively, produce various noise and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. vibration emissions. Specifically, the noise and vibrations come from (1) cars…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API