Legal Opinion
Bullard v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 23, 1967No. 1394PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.
The defendant corporation was served with summons and complaint in this diversity action pursuant to Rule 4(d) (7), Fed.R.Civ.P., and Rules 4D(2) (f) and 4D(6) (a) Mont.R.Civ.P.
It now contests the jurisdiction of this court on the grounds that the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over it pursuant to the Montana rules violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The defendant is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. It manufactures a hair styling lotion called “Jon-James Perform” which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vencedor Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Gougler Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Callahan v. Keystone Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Bi-Lo Foods, Inc. v. Alpine Bank, CliftonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Haker v. Southwestern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Continental Oil Company v. Atwood & Morrill CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.