Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Company v. Atwood & Morrill Company
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 27, 1967No. Civ. 608PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMESON, Chief Judge.
The defendant has moved to quash service of summons and dismiss for want of jurisdiction, or alternatively, for a change of venue. Defendant, a Massachusetts corporation, was served with summons and complaint at its principal place of business, in Salem, Massachusetts, pursuant to Rules 4(d) (7) and 4(d) (3) F.R.Civ.P. and Rules 4, subd. D(3) and 4, subd. D(2) (e) Mont.R. Civ.P. Defendant contends that the exercise of jurisdiction by this court would be in violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 1
By stipulation of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Duple Motor Bodies, Ltd. v. Clarence A. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Haker v. Southwestern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Owatonna Manufacturing Company v. Melroe CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.