Legal Opinion

Whitmore v. Utah Fuel Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1913No. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seveutb District; Hon. Ferdinand Eridcson, Judge. Action by George O. Wbitmore against Utab Fuel Company and tbe Eio Grande Western Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTY, C. J.

Respondents have filed a petition for a rebearing. We have given tbe questions presented careful consideration, and are of tbe opinion tbat tbe decision heretofore filed in tbe cause on this appeal should in some particulars be modified. In view of tbe fact tbat counsel, both for appellant and respondents, have filed briefs in which they have ably and elaborately discussed tbe questions presented, we have decided to make tbe necessary changes in tbe opinion without reopening tbe case for oral argument. Tbe cause will be ruled and determined by this opinion only.

Tbe complaint contains two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitmore v. Utah Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sigurd City v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Utah Wool Pulling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Moyle v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Utah Wool Pulling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API