Moyle v. Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
1Dissent
WOLFE, Justice.
I dissent on the questions of damages and disposition of the case. On the other matters I concur. I think the judgment should be reserved and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the principles hereinafter developed.
In approaching the problem of the measure of damages in a condemnation of water right as in all other condemnation cases regard must be had for the nature of the thing condemned. There are a number of decisions of this court represented by such cases as Shurtleff v. Salt Lake City, 1938, 96 Utah 21, 82 P. 2d 561, which indirectly assume that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Butte Canal & Ditch Co. v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Hill v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.