Dorr v. Smith, Keller & Associates

KITE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark A. Dorr appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to declare Smith, Keller & Associates' (SKA) judgment against him satisfied. He challenges the district court's rulings that posting a supersede-as bond did not stop interest from accruing on the judgment and he was not entitled to credit against the judgment for settlements made by third parties in related actions.

[T2] Finding no error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 3] Mr. Dorr articulates two appellate issues:

I. Whether the District Court erred when it ruled that the posting of a superse-deas bond does not…