Legal Opinion
Office of State Lands & Investments v. Mule Shoe Ranch, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2011No. S-10-0181, S-10-0182PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Chief Justice.
[T1] Mule Shoe Ranch, Inc. (Mule Shoe) sought to exercise its preferential right to renew a state lease. Two Y Ranch (Two Y) submitted a competing bid at a higher rate. The director of the Office of State Lands and Investments (State Lands Office) issued a decision requiring Mule Shoe to match the higher bid in order to exercise its preferential right. Mule Shoe requested an administrative hearing.
[T2] The State Lands Office and Mule Shoe filed motions for summary judgment. The Board of Land Commissioners (Board) granted summary judgment to the State Lands Office, agreeing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stutzman v. Office of the Wyoming State EngineerWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Attorney GeneralWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Dorr v. Smith, Keller & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Wyoming Medical Center, Inc. v. Wyoming Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Barlow Ranch, Limited Partnership v. Greencore Pipeline Company LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Northern Laramie Range Foundation v. Converse County Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Michael's Construction, Inc. v. American National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- International Association of Firefighters Local Union No. 279 v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- J & T Properties, LLC v. GallagherWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.