Legal Opinion

State v. Kirsch

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1995No. 92-684PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, David W. Kirsch, appeals his convictions, after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.), of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (1986), and felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:3 (1986). He argues that the trial court erred: (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence; (2) in admitting evidence of other sexual assaults under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b); and (3) in denying his motion for a mistrial. We reverse and remand.

The defendant was tried on thirteen indictments charging sexual assaults on three young girls between 1984 and 1987. In addition to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. MarcotteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Ricky Lee PutmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State v. MelcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API