State v. Kirsch
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, David W. Kirsch, appeals his convictions, after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.), of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (1986), and felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:3 (1986). He argues that the trial court erred: (1) in denying his motion to suppress evidence; (2) in admitting evidence of other sexual assaults under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b); and (3) in denying his motion for a mistrial. We reverse and remand.
The defendant was tried on thirteen indictments charging sexual assaults on three young girls between 1984 and 1987. In addition to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. MarcotteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Ricky Lee PutmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. MelcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.