Legal Opinion

Leatherwood v. Richardson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1907No. Civil No. 1005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge.

1Per curiam

— In this case there is no assignment of errors. Rev. Stats. 1901, par. 1586; Gardiner v. Gardiner, 7 Ariz. 73, 60 Pac. 875; Maricopa County v. Jordan, 7 Ariz. 4, 60 Pac. 693; Utah Canal Enlargement & Extension Co. v. London Co., 7 Ariz. 1, 60 Pac. 722. There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions, except in the form of a transcript of the reporter’s notes. This transcript has not been allowed by the trial judge, and hence cannot be considered as a bill of exceptions. It was not filed in the district court within the term at which the judgment was rendered, and time within which it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maricopa County v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gardiner v. GardinerArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Utah Canal Enlargement & Extension Co. v. London Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molina v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Romero v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API