Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Gardiner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1900No. Civil No. 715PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. "Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated' in the opinion.

1Per curiam

No assignments of error have been filed by appellant or appear in the briefs filed. We have so often decided that a failure to comply with the statutory requirement as to assignments of error amounts to a waiver of all errors which are not fundamental, as to render it a work of supererogation to do more than again call attention to these rulings and the imperative requirement of the statute. In the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the judgment must be affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bouldin v. SheererArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Leatherwood v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1907