Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich Manzanedo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 29, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0238PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, Matthew Manzanedo was convicted of assault with intent to incite a riot or participation in a riot and criminal damage. The convictions stemmed from a prison riot at the Pinal County Detention Center in which two officers were assaulted and the prison sustained over $23,000 in damage.1 The trial court sentenced Manza-nedo to concurrent, enhanced, aggravated prison terms of ten and twenty-two years. We affirm his convictions and sentences.

¶2 On appeal, Manzanedo argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Jorge Ibanez-Beltran v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. State v. ArvalloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API