Legal Opinion
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1996No. B104133PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
This writ proceeding presents a question whether confirmation of an arbitration award pursuant to Civil Code section 2860 is inconsistent with a prior reservation of rights issued by an insurance carrier. We conclude that it is not, and grant a peremptory writ of mandate ordering the trial court to set aside the original order granting summary adjudication in favor of real parties in interest.
Statement of Facts
On July 24, 1991, real parties in interest, Andrew Cherng, Peggy Cherng, Panda Management Company, Inc., Panda Express, Inc., and Galleria II Panda Express, Inc.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Blue Ridge Insurance v. JacobsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- James 3 Corp. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich v. Vigilant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.