Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-572PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.

In a challenge predicated upon R.C. 2941.25, appellant contends that aggravated burglary and theft are allied offenses of similar import and that an accused may not be convicted of both where they arise out of a single incident. On this basis, appellant urges this court to set aside his two convictions for theft.

The authority relied upon by appellant, R.C. 2941.25, is Ohio’s codification of the judicial doctrine of merger. State v. Thomas (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 254 [15 O.O.3d 262], That statute provides as follows:

“(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. GoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API