In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
Pursuant to Const 1963, art 3, § 8, this Court granted the Governor’s request for an advisory *300opinion on the constitutionality of 2011 PA 38.1 More specifically, we granted the Governor’s request to address the following four constitutional questions:(1) whether reducing or eliminating the statutory exemption for public-pension incomes as described in MCL 206.30, as amended, impairs accrued financial benefits of a “pension plan [or] retirement system of the state [or] its political subdivisions” under Const 1963, art 9, § 24; (2) whether reducing or eliminating the statutory tax exemption for…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Menard Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Cherryland Mall Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re City of DetroitUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.