Legal Opinion

Land Grantors v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 14, 2006No. 93-648XPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*519SECOND INTERIM REPORT, MEMORANDUM OPINION, AND ORDER

BRADEN, Judge and Hearing Officer.

I. Background Statement.1

Shortly after the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired approximately 35,849.28 acres of land in the counties of Henderson, Union, and Webster, Kentucky to establish an Army training facility, that later was named Camp Breckin-ridge. Almost all of this property was owned by farmers who resided on the land, that had been in their families for generations and, more importantly, on which they depended for their livelihood. On March 7, 1942, the Secretary of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land Grantors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union & Webster Counties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Land Grantors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Land Grantors in Henderson Union & Webster Counties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API