Legal Opinion
Medical Mutual of Ohio v. DeSoto
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 27, 2001No. Nos. 99-3988, 00-3571PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, Judge, joined by Merritt, *564Judge,
GILMAN, Judge (pp. 575-77), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
AMENDED OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
This Employee Retirement Insurance and Security Act (ERISA) action comes before the court on the consolidated appeals of defendants, Denise deSoto and Jose deSoto, from (1) the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Medical Mutual of Ohio (MMO) finding the deSotos liable for unpaid reimbursement funds due under MMO’s welfare benefit plan and (2) its judgment awarding MMO attorneys’ fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1). On appeal, the deSotos assert the district court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. Healthcare Benefits Plan v. DurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jamhour v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.